Interest in Ozmosis
- hyux1
- Unerledigt
-
-
The license itself is called the Creative Common License.
-
Ozmosis has always been under the copyright of HermitCrab Labs and never been released to the public as also stated in the header of the posted File:
Alles anzeigenCodeAs long as you are not the legitimate owner of the code or have the explicit permission of owners/creators publishing copyright protected code is a copyright infringement and is therefore not allowed in our forums. If you really feel the need to publish copyright protected material without the owners permission, what I highly advise against, use an other Plattform than ours (eg. GitHub or anything else suitable). Don't get me wrong it is nothing personal but I have to protect our platform and its users from possible legal consequences that might arise and therefore deleted the posted file...
-
Yeah Github links are okay in my opinion:)
-
Why did you delete it?
The publication of the source code begins at this point.
-
Why did you delete it?
Guess three times.
-
Why did you delete it?
I didn't delete it, just set it private. I can also change it again.
Guess three times.
Then give the reason
-
- It is NOT your source code.
- Each file contains a copyright notice that clearly states „all rights reserved“.
- You most likely don‘t have written confirmation of all authors involved in creating the code to republish the code under a GPL.
- You can‘t argue the code has fallen under open source because of that.
- Still, you attached the GPL info to your repo, misleading others, violating the TOS of GitHub and violating the rights of the original author(s).
- Moreover, you haven‘t even modified/forked the original code in any meaningful way, so you have no ownership at all over the code base.
-
- It is NOT your source code.
- Each file contains a copyright notice that clearly states „all rights reserved“.
- You most likely don‘t have written confirmation of all authors involved in creating the code to republish the code under a GPL.
- You can‘t argue the code has fallen under open source because of that.
- Still, you attached the GPL info to your repo, misleading others, violating the TOS of GitHub and violating the rights of the original author(s).
- Moreover, you haven‘t even modified/forked the original code in any meaningful way, so you have no ownership at all over the code base.
How do you come to the conclusion that I have nothing to do with it and it's not my code? Besides, who cares? Is it your problem?
griven administrator of the forum said that this is fine.
-
griven said it was okay to post the link to the repo instead of the offending files. Nobody said otherwise. But you or someone else decided that the repo is gone only 24h after publishing the link here. Or "made it private" after claiming the "publication of the source code" started. You were asked why the link is dead, but you didn't answer. I've just given "a reason" for that - YOU asked for it instead of giving the reasons yourself. I have only tried to fill in the gaps you are not answering by looking at the content of the repo and your comments in this thread.
Remember: you mentioned you have not enough knowledge to do the work yourself and are looking for people interested in helping you. And now you really suggest it is your code and you are HermitCrab Labs or its legal successor? Thats just stupid.
"Who cares?" Nobody cares, many have already told you that you are riding a dead horse. But you posted the link to a repo that is already gone just hours later. And then you didn't give answers to the question why you deleted it / set it private. Do you really think that helps getting anyone interested in working with you? So ... perhaps YOU should care.
