Interest in Ozmosis

du redest viel wenn der Tag lang ist. Was hat das damit zu tun, hier Fragen zu stellen die nur Du selbst beantworten kannst. Willst die hier die User aufs Glatteis führen?

Edit: Damit will ich meinen Beitrag hier abschließen.

Ozmosis has always been under the copyright of HermitCrab Labs and never been released to the public as also stated in the header of the posted File:

As long as you are not the legitimate owner of the code or have the explicit permission of owners/creators publishing copyright protected code is a copyright infringement and is therefore not allowed in our forums. If you really feel the need to publish copyright protected material without the owners permission, what I highly advise against, use an other Plattform than ours (eg. GitHub or anything else suitable). Don't get me wrong it is nothing personal but I have to protect our platform and its users from possible legal consequences that might arise and therefore deleted the posted file...

Yeah Github links are okay in my opinion:)

Why did you delete it?

Zitat von hyux1

The publication of the source code begins at this point.

https://github.com/hyux-1/Oz

Zitat von pupokass

Why did you delete it?

Guess three times.

1. It is NOT your source code.
2. Each file contains a copyright notice that clearly states „all rights reserved“.
3. You most likely don‘t have written confirmation of all authors involved in creating the code to republish the code under a GPL.
4. You can‘t argue the code has fallen under open source because of that.
5. Still, you attached the GPL info to your repo, misleading others, violating the TOS of GitHub and violating the rights of the original author(s).
6. Moreover, you haven‘t even modified/forked the original code in any meaningful way, so you have no ownership at all over the code base.

griven said it was okay to post the link to the repo instead of the offending files. Nobody said otherwise. But you or someone else decided that the repo is gone only 24h after publishing the link here. Or "made it private" after claiming the "publication of the source code" started. You were asked why the link is dead, but you didn't answer. I've just given "a reason" for that - YOU asked for it instead of giving the reasons yourself. I have only tried to fill in the gaps you are not answering by looking at the content of the repo and your comments in this thread.

Remember: you mentioned you have not enough knowledge to do the work yourself and are looking for people interested in helping you. And now you really suggest it is your code and you are HermitCrab Labs or its legal successor? Thats just stupid.

"Who cares?" Nobody cares, many have already told you that you are riding a dead horse. But you posted the link to a repo that is already gone just hours later. And then you didn't give answers to the question why you deleted it / set it private. Do you really think that helps getting anyone interested in working with you? So ... perhaps YOU should care.

That's really interesting, apart from all the kindergarten going on here. When you're in contact with the developers, do you get support for your project?

Zitat von hyux1

Ask one of the Hermits in the forum if you know who I mean.

STLVNUB? There were previous issues with him threatening to leak the code and his access was revoked at some point. I’m not even sure you leaked the latest revision.

As you are being an entitled little prick, let me clear things up. You are not involved, you do not have sufficient rights over the code (I never signed off for my code, and the actual developers unlike STLVNUB likely didn’t either), and this violates our copyrights. While there indeed were traces of an open-source license in the tree, these were in preparation for an open-source release that never happened. A file alone is not sufficient to consider the code licensed, it must be explicitly released under the license by the authors. This never happened.

Further, your constant complaints about others not being developers are amusing. I’m not just a developer, I’m a former Ozmosis developer, and you ignored all my inputs, violated my copyright, made up weird fever daydreams about competition (between two things I both worked on??), and on top of that, you’re just an attention-seeking nuisance who leaks code while too incompetent to do anything with it anyway. You might as well call yourself an Influencer.

griven Can you please finally take care of this?

Zitat von Raoul Duke

That's really interesting, apart from all the kindergarten going on here. When you're in contact with the developers, do you get support for your project?

Interesting too, that this thread is still alive. Let it dry out ... done.

Since mhaeuser, as an former part of HermitCrab and an current part of the OpenCore Dev Team and as an owner of at least parts of the leaked code, clearly said the code we're talking about was released without the permission of the legit owners and is copyright protected. Due to this very clear and understandable statement and by request I now end this discussion and therefore close this thread.