Um schreiben oder kommentieren zu können, benötigst du ein Benutzerkonto.
Du hast schon ein Benutzerkonto? Melde dich hier hier an.
Jetzt anmeldenHier kannst du ein neues Benutzerkonto erstellen.
Neues Benutzerkonto erstellenA common error is about SIP (it should be disabled before you do all installation)
This AMD ix is valid for all CC version and the only problem unsolved for now is with stabilisation and Morph Cut effects in premiere
I do not know others guide
Maybe you can ask to the guide and method creator (@tomnic)
Gordon-1979 sorry for English but my German could be also worst.
in below schema you can see how to build patch for different system.
XX is your cores number, as you did well 06 for a 6 cores, 08 for a 8 cores, 0c for a 12 cores, 10 for a 16 cores, 20 for a 32 cores
It is possible to not use this patch if you compile Opencore shaneee PR which include those patches inside a quirk:
ProvideCurrentCpuInfo
attention only PR Opencore edition has those patches included. Official release No
Sorry to be a bit off topic
Beta 4 on 3970x threadripper!
Beta 2 on Threadripper 39070x 
Thank @algrey
5fps is about 12.5 % faster...in same situation could be useful
then I agree in normal condition a 6900xt is not a best BFTB..
walter77 when have had your same motherboard there was a weird behaviour with Davinci Resolve preference
different result with different approach to select gpu and metal
Alles anzeigen
3x RX 6900 XT, 64 Nodes: 65 fps
3x RX 6900 XT, 6 Nodes THN: 35 fps
2x RX 6900 XT, 64 Nodes: 55 fps max
2x RX 6900 XT, 6 Nodes THN: 29 fps
1x RX 6900 XT, 64 Nodes: 31 fps max
1x RX 6900 XT, 6 Nodes THN: 27 fps
So that's not linear but i think for other Davinci related reasons.
Another nice test is a speed change to 25% with Retime Process set to Optical Flow and Motion Estimation set to Speed Warp.
1x RX6900Xt
6 TRN nodes:
66 Blur nodes:
System in signature:
:
If you have some project to test for retime process set to optical flow I will like to tst it
Thank you
sorry walter77 I have posted original project with is lock to 24fps..you can pu there 250 in project settings
You should test 6 nodes and 66 nodes I have read better now (it seems only two gpu are used for playback..but maybe I am wrong on this
I have this results with only a GPU with my trx40 in signature
6 nodes
30/32 fps
66 nodes
40/42 fps
On intel platform. you can try also to force Metal and test then to force in auto and test again
In the past on intel platform Davinci had a weird behaviour for this two settings
Thank you a lot for your test
walter77 thank you
here for the project:
here if you want to se how to use and test:
if your 3 GPU scale well in your system it should be a top beast in Davinci Resolve.
My single 6900 XT in Metal performs better than my previous RTX 3090 Fe in CUDA
walter77 very curious to see a Davinci Resolve Candle benchmarkreuslt with your 3 gpu!
AMD users have to wait to try to start to find these new missing patches:
different problem here
now I need of pikera boot args to login with AMD 6900xt Gpu and MacPro7.1
Middle mouse button wheel in Safari browser does not work
in Chrome is ok.....
Ja weil es Rc ist, aber was genau soll denn laufen?
Mork vom Ork interessant wäre zu wissen ob RBar SAM etc nun geht mit 11.4 RC
I can Enable resize bar if I disable 4G
Both togheter enabled inhibit OSX to start properly (on my rig in signature)
good job apple!
Candle standar benchmark
66 noise nodes 31 fps
6 TRN nodes 40 fps
I have tested a 6900xt of a user in another forum
Candle benchmark in Davinci resolve classic 66 and 6 nodes produces a speed comparable to my previous Vega 64 in metal
17 fps (66 nodes)
21 fps (6 TRN nodes)
In a job i have done in 8k i cant see any workflow difference with my actual GPU (3090)
Candel Benchmark is not good with first release (metal/OSX drivers)
System used AMD 3970x 256 Gb AMD 6900 xt
May i ask if some of you have tested Davinci Candle Benchmark with 6800xt/6900xt in metal if available at this development driver stage?
Thank you
