Look at the link again. I made it public again.
Ask one of the Hermits in the forum if you know who I mean.
Um schreiben oder kommentieren zu können, benötigst du ein Benutzerkonto.
Du hast schon ein Benutzerkonto? Melde dich hier hier an.
Jetzt anmeldenHier kannst du ein neues Benutzerkonto erstellen.
Neues Benutzerkonto erstellenLook at the link again. I made it public again.
Ask one of the Hermits in the forum if you know who I mean.
- It is NOT your source code.
- Each file contains a copyright notice that clearly states „all rights reserved“.
- You most likely don‘t have written confirmation of all authors involved in creating the code to republish the code under a GPL.
- You can‘t argue the code has fallen under open source because of that.
- Still, you attached the GPL info to your repo, misleading others, violating the TOS of GitHub and violating the rights of the original author(s).
- Moreover, you haven‘t even modified/forked the original code in any meaningful way, so you have no ownership at all over the code base.
How do you come to the conclusion that I have nothing to do with it and it's not my code? Besides, who cares? Is it your problem?
griven administrator of the forum said that this is fine.
Why did you delete it?
I didn't delete it, just set it private. I can also change it again.
Guess three times.
Then give the reason
The publication of the source code begins at this point.
Is it okay for you if I post the Github link in the forum?
The publication of the source code begins at this point.
The license itself is called the Creative Common License.
Mir ist nicht bekannt, dass Quellcode für Software ohne jegliche Lizenzinformationen verbreitet wird, gleich welcher Art die Lizenz ist. Die Information zur CCPL Lizenz - die ich zitierte - fand ich bei einem Ozmosis-Projekt auf Github. Warum meinst Du dass ich diese falsch wiedergeben hätte? Nur weil ein anderer User auf eine andere Lizenz verlinkt hatte?
Egal, die Lizenz deiner Software müsstest Du kennen und ich stelle Dir die Frage, weshalb Du dann hier noch Fragen zur Veröffentlichung stelltest?
Wenn der von Dir kompilierte ursprüngliche Quellcode keine solche Informationen enthält und Du ahnungslos bist wer der Inhaber des Urheberrechts ist, dann sollte Du diesen hier wohl besser nicht feilbieten.
Github wäre gut. Da bekommst Du sicherlich die ersehnte Aufmerksamkeit. Die CCPL Lizenz die ich zitierte fand ich bei einem Ozmosis-Projekt auf Github.
I was not familiar with the abbreviation CCPL until now. It is CC or CCL. The license in the source code is literally the same as the one in the Github project "OzmosisBIOS" by "tuxuser". I asked for reasons against it here, it has nothing directly to do with the license.
Alles anzeigenOh boy.
Unless there is an open source license placed in the source folder by the original author, then it is closed source.
Even if you have the source all you do is illegal (until you are the originbal author)
So you asking people to do a crime.
(When you want people to work on maybe stolen source code)
THIS IS A CRIME IN GERMANY
And this is definitely against so forum rules. (5.3)
THAT IS THE PROBLEM I HAVE with your behavior.
Ok with #66 i violated (5.1.1) -> but it was the shortes possibility to answer.
Even if it were, I haven't published any code yet and thus haven't done anything illegal. I just compiled new versions and uploaded them. I'm just asking if anyone wants to work on the code. Besides, you say it's a crime in Germany. For me, that would not be relevant. I could also upload the code to Github, then it wouldn't be a problem for the forum either.
I'll do it, but if someone pretends to be a developer (but without having a clue), I consider it a provocation.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Commons_license
Licensing stuff imo
Thank you for contributing, unlike others.
Ja, das dachte ich mir, ziemlich große Klappe aber wenn du die Lizenz nicht einmal hast, was willst du mit dem Quellcode? Jetzt wissen wir wer hier der Troll ist.
So you really think that the code can't be used without a license? Who is the one without a clue here? First name a false abbreviation, and then be cheeky, old man? You're a troll, as well as Moorviper.
Alles anzeigenThose minor advantages as you mentioned before are not with the 10 Grand, measured by payment/time you’ll -sure more- spend into developing something -maybe anyhow- working like ozmosis before.
better get some M stuff for the cash, relax and enjoy the sun.
First world problems aren’t such good as the were years before, life has more advantages to focus on…
OC is the way to go until the King is dead forever.
Sorry but it’s the truth, keeps it and better appreciate those who made OC possible instead of looking for the next new old fucking cool Feature OC doesn’t have.
OC has the major one: a clean and maintainable, documented Code which ist frequently updated…for free.
I don't have to recreate Ozmosis, I have the source code of Ozmosis. This would only have to be extended by parts of OpenCore to make it work. This was also done at Clover.
Du kennst die CCPL? Dann beachte diese.
I don't understand what you mean.
What's your problem? If you don't want to contribute anything (or can't, as it probably is in your case) you should hold back! You're just trolling here, so shut up.
Can anyone give a reason against publishing the source code?
Yes, if it would work with current OS. Since Ozmosis also has advantages over OpenCore.
You've already shouted loudly enough that you have the source code. Cool, do something with it. But with your behavior and talk about competition you're making a fool of yourself
It's the truth. Do you really think mhaeuser will support OpenCore's competition?
then you just have to find a way to involve them in your project
here it seems to me that you are not succeeding.
Reading doesn't bother me that much though
Yes, I try.
OT: do not feed the Troll
he will not give up
If you don't want to (or rather can't) contribute anything meaningful, then hold back!
One of the very few people who could help made it clear that he is not willing because of the structural limitations of the product itself
why insist on it?
cui prodest?
mhaeuser? He probably won't want to compete with his OpenCore, so it's understandable that he doesn't want to help. But there are also other developers.
As mentioned earlier, I'm not such a good developer. I would have to understand the OpenCore code completely in order to be able to integrate the corresponding part. Besides, it's quite a lot of work for you alone, I need support.
Think you're funny?
Or do you think that no one is interested in Ozmosis?
Like Bob-Schmu: He thinks the answer in the insanelymac thread is negative to the project, after my answer to it he probably has no more arguments.
You wanted an answer, here is one.
https://www.insanelymac.com/fo…ndComment&comment=2822483
Carry on with your little project and see how far you get.
I hope you have a lot of fun with it.
This answer is very positive about the project, or do you understand it differently? He speaks out in favor of Ozmosis.